rpms/apg/devel apg.spec,1.7,1.8

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 13:52 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:25:27 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 08:54 -0400, Oliver Falk wrote:
> > > > Author: oliver
> > > > 
> > > > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apg/devel In directory 
> > > > cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9979
> > > > 
> > > > Modified Files:
> > > > 	apg.spec
> > > > Log Message:
> > > > * Make apg in devel branch newer than the one in FC3 tree (adding 
> > > > _FC4 to the release tag)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Index: apg.spec
> > > 
> > > > -Release:		1
> > > > +Release:		1_FC4
> > > 
> > > Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought there was an 
> > > agreement 
> > > to use *.fc4.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, boys, but not having a strict convention on disttags isn't 
> > > going to help anybody.
> > 
> > Yes, lower-case and separated with a dot: .fc4
> > 
> > But it's not documented in the Wiki yet, is it?
> 
> No, it is not and that's
It is deeply hidden in the Wiki:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag#head-053db4146a7698acf039f3fe3176f3f3dee56564

>  - I guess - is the reason, why many people do it
> wrong. :-) (eg. kernel;)
The kernel is FC. FC is redhat's playground - It's their freedom to
apply whatever conventions they want.

AFAICT, they don't have any conventions.

> PS: Shall I follow Matthias and use 2 as release tag, or is it better to use
> .fc4 now?
IMO, the latter.

Ralf