Epoch 0 (was: rpms/lft/devel lft.spec,1.6,1.7)

Dag Wieers dag at wieers.com
Thu Mar 3 16:01:04 UTC 2005


On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:27:13 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:22:22 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote:
> > > 
> > > > (And I'm only repeating this because you imply things about me that are 
> > > > incorrect or shortsighted.)
> > > 
> > > I don't imply anything about you, I did not even refer to you
> > > specifically.
> > 
> > Well, sorry Michael, but you did say:
> > 
> > 	"A burden so high that I would complain forever and rather choose 
> > 	to boycott a community project than get productive."
> > 
> > and I can't do anything else than interprete this as addressing me. If it 
> > wasn't, I have a hard time to put this into another context.
> 
> The hint is still in there (even after you had cut off the rest of the
> context):
> 
>   [...] that _I_ would [...]
> 
> You asked for my "line of thought", I gave it. No idea why you feel the
> need to take something personal.

Michael, a little honesty here. It served no other purpose than implying 
something. The context does not matter. In language it's a construct to 
say what you would (or would not) do to imply that someone else (in this 
case me) is doing. It can't be interpreted any other way. 'Implied' means 
that it is not explicitly said.

If this was not the intent, it has no purpose to even mention it. 
So of course I feel the need to defend myself. It's predictable.

Kind regards,
--   dag wieers,  dag at wieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]




More information about the fedora-extras-commits mailing list