rpms/inti/devel inti.spec,1.2,1.3

Michael Schwendt bugs.michael at gmx.net
Thu Mar 3 22:57:40 UTC 2005


On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:34:47 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:

> Michael Schwendt wrote :
> 
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:46:24 -0500, Matthias Saou (thias) wrote:
> > 
> > >  Name:           inti
> > >  Version:        1.2
> > > -Release:        0.fdr.5.1
> > > -Epoch:          0
> > > +Release:        1
> > 
> > Release change is pointless here. Please don't mix such changes with the
> > other documented mass-changes. inti package is broken for quite some
> > time (GTK incompatibility) and has not been updated since then. Release
> > should stay to reflect that. Also on the other packages with 0.fdr
> > prefix, please.
> 
> Second time I make that "mistake" IIRC.
> For me, a *.fdr.* release has nothing to do in the devel branch... so
> either it should be fixed (what I unconsciously and repeatedly seem to want
> to do) with the building disabled, or it shouldn't have a devel branch at
> all.

+1

And I'd say this time we get rid of these few packages before first FC4
Test rebuild. They could be resurrected anytime.




More information about the fedora-extras-commits mailing list