[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Review needed: notecase



On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 21:56 -0400, Toshio wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 18:07 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > *sigh*
> > 
> > "LD=$(CXX) $(DEBUG) $(PROFILE) -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -ldl -export-
> > dynamic"
> > 
> > How would I handle this for 64-bit builds? "make LD=...
> > -L%{_prefix}/X11R6/%{_lib} ..." in the spec file?
> > 
> I'm very tired from not having slept enough yesterday so I could have
> missed something important, but I just test built the srpm from CVS on
> an FC3 x86_64 box and it went smoothly.  ldd of the resulting binary
> shows that notecase successfully linked against the /usr/lib64/ versions
> of libraries.  My guess is that the gcc toolchain knows to
> search /usr/lib64 and /usr/X11R6/lib64 for libraries and it pulled
> things in automatically  (Maybe with some help from the gtk pkg-config
> flags.)

Yeah, but I figure I'm better safe then sorry.

> I noticed several gcc warnings that I think can be fixed by changing
> int/unsigned int's into long/unsigned long's.  Too tired to test changes
> ATM, but some of them do look to need fixing in order to make notecase
> run correctly on 64 bit.

I really need to get access to an x86_64 box so I can test this stuff
myself. Any takers?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]