[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: ulog not on ppc?



On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:03:22 +1000, David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:33 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > I'm betting it's just a user failing to include ppc in the build
> > request. It's not the first time.
> 
> Perhaps -- but since most packagers don't specify an arch to build when
> it's to be built for all arches, I figured it was best to ask rather
> than just change it.

That's misinterpretation. So far, most packagers have had to
specify "(i386, x86_64)" explicitly. It's a recent change that no arch
in brackets means to build for all archs.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]