[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Review Needed: sqlite2

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 14:20 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote :
> > I am actually going to leave it alone for now. The sqlite2 package
> > obsoletes the sqlite-2.8.16 package, so having the sqlite package remain
> > 2.8.16 is pointless should the sqlite2 package be branched to FC-3,
> > which is what will be required in order to provide a clean upgrade to
> > FC4 re kannel and moodss. But one step at a time.
> I still don't understand. Why change anything for FC-3 at all? I really
> don't see the point, and would prefer avoiding pushing out a new kannel
> package for FC-3 which has for only change a build requirement of "sqlite2-
> devel" instead of "sqlite-devel"...
> My preference would be to undo the sqlite v2 to v3 change in the FC-3
> branch, remove sqlite from the devel branch (as sqlite v3 is in Core) and
> import the FC-3 sqlite v2 as "sqlite2" in the devel branch with those last
> changes you suggested.
> >From there, we can fix and rebuild all packages in devel that rely on
> either version of sqlite, and make sure we provide a working upgrade path
> from FC3 to FC4 for end users.
> Why do you want to go and introduce major changes to the FC-3 branch?

The problem goes beyond just kannel and moodss. What about yum? Can yum
in Rawhide work equally well with sqlite 2.8 as well as 3?

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net>

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]