[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: New Package Process



On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 17:03 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Before reading the many messages in this thread, I need to state this:
> 
> NewPackageProcess was never meant to have a separate "sponsor" and 
> "review" during the package adding process.  Sponsor was to be referred 
> to only for what is necessary to get a CVS account, and "review" is the 
> process by which a package becomes approved.

So then what's necessary to get a package into CVS? Other than a CVS
account, of course.

> This process however we are trying to replace with the database driven 
> process, but that keeps getting held back due to being too busy with 
> other things.  I personally will have time to design it probably later 
> this week after FC4test3 is frozen.

If you want/need any help then feel free to ask. I have years of
experience architecting/writing database-oriented apps.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]