[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Request for Review: bmp-flac2



On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 00:54 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net> wrote:
> > I'd prefer to see a version number that won't require an Epoch bump in
> > the future.
> 
> I am not sure I understand the problem.

The version number in the package, "003", is equivalent to "3" according
to rpm. Can you guarantee that there will never be a package with a
version less than 3?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]