rpmlint (was: review still needed: fpc)

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Thu Aug 4 20:57:18 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 15:50 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> rpmlint output:
> 
> rpmlint /home/spot/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/fpc-2.0.0-1.i386.rpm
> E: fpc devel-dependency gpm-devel
> W: fpc invalid-license GPL and modified LGPL
> E: fpc statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/fpc/2.0.0/ppc386
> E: fpc statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/ppumove
> E: fpc statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/fpc
> E: fpc statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/pyacc
> E: fpc statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/unitdiff
> E: fpc statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/fpcmkcfg

When I run rpmlint on an x86 machine against an x86_64 rpm, I get errors
like these (statically-linked-binary) for all the binaries, even though
they're actually dynamically linked (rpmlint run against the i386
version of the same package is clean). Is this a known issue with
rpmlint or should I raise a bug on it?

Paul.
-- 
Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org>




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list