[Bug 166800] Review Request: sbcl-0.9.4-1: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sbcl-0.9.4-1: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166800





------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu  2005-08-29 09:50 EST -------
specfile names will certainly be fixed when imported to svn.

> setarch -R is required on FC4 to start sbcl,

I figured if it was *built* with that option, then the resulting binary would
inherit that behavior.  Turns out you're right.

> Shouldn't the src rpm contain bootstrapping binaries for all architectures?
> AFAIK src rpms are not architecture dependent.

Hmm, good point, probably.

> Have you tried clisp to bootstrap sbcl? I did not succeed. If you do, the
> binaries are not necessary.

Tried, it failed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.