Packages based on CVS sources
Michael A. Peters
mpeters at mac.com
Fri Dec 9 20:21:46 UTC 2005
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 13:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> Impossible in the classic "verifying tarball checksums" sense is what I
> meant.
>
> IMO, in general, if upstream developers are lazy/hesitant to make a
> formal release, it shouldn't be packaged.
I agree.
The problem is that CVS co can be awesome one day, horrible the next.
I do think that if a project is close to an actual release or official
snapshot, a cvs co in the development branch is fine.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list