[Bug 170131] Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170131





------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name  2005-12-23 07:37 EST -------
Well,

The main goal of this package is to add some standard PHP-tarball's modules
which are not compiled by default in FC. The added modules should look as if
they were compiled in the main PHP package (i.e. as if the FC php's maintainers
have decided to enable it as yet another main php's subpackage). Therefore these
extras packages should first follow the FC's php behaviour (considering it as a
precedent), and only then the recommended FE rules (if it is not conflicts with
the main php behavior).

> The packages should contain the text of the license
IMHO it is included in the main php. Php's subpackages (php-ldap, php-pgsql
etc.) do not include it.

> binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/php/modules/.... ['/usr/lib']
Strange... My rpmlint-0.71-1 say nothing about it. And there is no any
"/usr/lib" substrings in the binary files...

What version of rpmlint did you use? 
When you build the main php package the same way as php-extras, are there
similar reports about the main subpackages?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.