[Bug 174265] Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174265





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2005-12-29 13:33 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2) 
> >  
> > - Create two spec files that point to the same source tarball so that the 
> > package names (itcl, itk) can be preserved 
> > - Create itk as a subpackage so that only one copy of the source tarball is 
> > needed:  itcl, itcl-itk 
> >  
> > I'm leaning towards the second approach, even if it doesn't preserve the 
> > upstream package name.  Using the same source tarball in two packages seems 
> > awkward and error-prone. 
>  
>   Why not the second hypothesis calling the subpackage itk instead of 
> itcl-itk? 

Because I didn't know about "%package -n" until 10 minutes ago.  :)

I've now split it up into 4 packages:  itcl, itk, itcl-devel, itk-devel

The new spec file and srpm addressing the issues raised in comment #1 can be
found at:

http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/itcl-3.2.1-4.src.rpm
http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/itcl.spec


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.