xv-docs shouldn't be in Fedora Extras 3?

[seth vidal]

On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 20:13 -0500, Charles R. Anderson wrote:
> Fedora PreExtras 3 has an xv-docs package available, with no 
> corresponding xv package (required by xv-docs).  I find no component 
> in Fedora Extras 3 bugzilla to file a bug on this...
> 
> Maybe a "distribution" component should be added to bugzilla, like
> there is for Core?


1. this is best addressed on the fedora-extras-list

2. xv-docs should be removed too, xv and xv-docs are not legally
acceptable for extras. I'll clean up xv-docs, too, thanks.

-sv

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050110/19759c91/attachment.sig>