Request for a sponsor and a review of: pam_abl

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Mo, den 11.07.2005 schrieb Alexander Dalloz um 18:42:

> Hello fellows!

> Alexander

Its me again - next round for a review :)

http://www.uni-x.org/pam_abl-0.2.2-1.src.rpm
http://www.uni-x.org/pam_abl.spec

Beside changes to be found in %changelog some additional notes:

- the author of pam_abl Andy Armstrong replied very quickly and friendly
to my mail: future versions will no longer have the date string in the
tarball's name; releases are only differed by the release number
(current on is 0.2.2)
  so I changed the release tag, being aware that this would mean a lower
value now than before; think it does no harm here as the package is
still in review and the former one histore now
- running rpmlint gives me:
  $ rpmlint pam_abl-0.2.2-1.i386.rpm
E: pam_abl library-not-linked-against-libc /lib/security/pam_abl.so
I am confused as of:
  $ ldd /lib/security/pam_abl.so
        libdb-4.2.so => /lib/tls/libdb-4.2.so (0x00a9e000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x003d7000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00111000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x008fd000)

- Oliver, rereading your first review I noticed that you commented about
the .spec file:
  * You should not make
  Could you please tell me what is meant by that?

Further critics appreciated, but would be glad too to hear this is a
major step forward to being approved.

Alexander


-- 
 
1024D/866ED681 2005-07-11 Alexander Dalloz (Fedora Project) <alex at dalloz.de>
Key fingerprint = CD40 0A91 7814 C1E4 5940  8E0E 1FD5 C316 866E D681

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050713/1c18d0b1/attachment.sig>