libxml++ is old

[Daniel Veillard]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:03:06AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On 20/07/05, Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > libxml++ is C++ bindings for libxml/libxml2.
> > 
> >   Right, well more precisely it is *one* of the C++ bindings for libxml2
> > though those days it clearly the most popular. The question still remains:
> > what uses it ? If there was really a shortage for maintainers and a need
> > I could try to handle it myself, but I would rather delegate :-)
> 
> How hard would it be to create, analogously to libxml/libxml2,
> libxml++ and libxml2++? Does libxml++-2.x live happily alongside
> libxml++-1.x?

  libxml v1 is dead.
  the libxml++ jump in numbering isn't as drastic a jump as it was
for libxml. And I would rather avoid keeping dual versions for the
C++ bindings if there is nothing really requiring the old one. So
back to the core question: what is using libxml C++ bindings ?

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard at redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/