[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Request for review: latex-prosper



On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 22:45 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 05:29 +0100, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote:
> > Michael Peters,
> > 
> > > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/latex-prosper.spec
> > > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/latex-prosper-1.00.4-0.1.src.rpm
> > 
> > The namespace for LaTeX packages in Fedora is tetex. Please
> > rename the package to tetex-prosper.
> 
> done
> 
> http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-prosper.spec
> http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-prosper-1.00.4-0.1.src.rpm
> 
> fixed License tag as well

Are there any outstanding issues?
I'd like to get someone to sponsor this for inclusion in CVS.
I believe I have CVS access (haven't tried to commit anything yet - only
package that has had explicit approval stopped building on x86 on
rawhide :-/ ) but I need the explicit approval.

This is an extremely low maintenance noarch package.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]