Request for review: latex-prosper

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 00:47 -0400, Ed Hill wrote:
>      all seem to return the *same* BSD-like license which is 
>      included below.

It's missing the "our name cannot be used to promote derived works"
clause that BSD has, so IMO it would be wrong to call this BSD. It is in
fact much, *much* closer to the MIT license.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050601/9d428802/attachment.sig>