[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Request for review: latex-prosper



On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 00:47 -0400, Ed Hill wrote:
>      all seem to return the *same* BSD-like license which is 
>      included below.

It's missing the "our name cannot be used to promote derived works"
clause that BSD has, so IMO it would be wrong to call this BSD. It is in
fact much, *much* closer to the MIT license.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]