package submission policy question

[Chris Ricker]

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, seth vidal wrote:

> I made the joke about porn but, well, if I had a package of
> license-compatible porn and a special viewer for it I think people would
> raise a fit about including it.

Unfortunately, the special porn viewers are all in livna due to codec 
licensing / patents / etc ;-)

> maybe it would be best for fedora extras to stay out of the content
> business, just provide the ways to access the content.

Sometimes content inclusion's the whole point though - fortune-mod being a 
good example

later,
chris