[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Package Review Process Proposal



Dave Lawrence wrote:

>Package Review Proof of Concept
>-------------------------------
>
>I have created a new product in our production Bugzilla called "Fedora Extras Package Review".
>When clicking on the link, the user gets a stripped down version of a entry form with just 
>a few required fields represented. Platform, Cc, URL, Summary, and Description. The values
>would be similar to the what was being entered into review requests at fedora.us. The review
>requests can have assigned to, qa contact and initial cc members just like and other Bugzilla
>component. These can be some sort of package-review-list mailing list or fedora-extras-list,
>whichever. Once the new report is submitted, there are several new status flags which only
>display for package requests specifically. These are currently:
>
>Name            Description
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>extras‑legal    Package reviewed for any known legal issues or licencing problems.
>extras‑review   Package review request picked up and in progress.
>extras‑cvs      Package imported into CVS properly.
>extras‑approval Package approval for inclusion in the Fedora Extras project
>extras‑fc3      Package approval for inclusion in the FC3 version of the Fedora Extras project.
>extras‑fc4      Package approval for inclusion in the FC4 version of the Fedora Extras project.
>  
>
Why a separate approval for Extras, FC3, and FC4? Will there eventually
be an approval for extras-fc5, etc?

-Quentin


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]