[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Realtime Kernel patch



On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:47 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:20:32AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
>  > On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 19:59 +1000, Peter Lawler wrote:
>  > 
>  > > I notice CCRMA have a realtime/low-latency kernel. As they rightly 
>  > > state, jack's fairly useless without realtime/low-latency 
>  > > http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/installtwosix.html#SECTION000201000000000000000
>  > > 
>  > > Just wondering what other people think of this, and whether extras might 
>  > > carry Ingo's rtp'd kernel? My 'desire' to enable Extras to carry real 
>  > > decent A/V software would depend on this. Thoughts?
>  > 
>  > I don't want to have a "one-off" kernel in Fedora Extras unless there is
>  > no other way. I would strongly prefer petitioning DaveJ to get this code
>  > in the FC5 kernel (and maybe an FC4 update).
> 
> Ingo's bits are scheduled for inclusion in an update.
> They arrived a bit late for the FC4 kernel, so I didn't want to
> take a last-minute risk that could've caused us to have to slip
> the release further than we already did if something went wrong.

Dave, could you revive this thread when that update with the ingo bits
goes out? :)

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]