[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Request for review: fnfx



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> All I can recall is this:
> 
> http://www.fedora.us/pipermail/fedora-devel/2003-June/001454.html
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.general/4867
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-April/msg00559.html
> 
> This isn't conclusive:
> 
> http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/developers-guide/ch-rpm-building.html
>
> I guess there's no consensus.  I wonder if we couldn't get an official
> ruling one way or the other (or that it doesn't matter) so that this
> can go in the Wiki.

That would be great. I don't mind one way or the other... i am just familiar
with the one I used... would hate to see this stuck because of this...

- - Andreas

- --
Andreas Bierfert               | http://awbsworld.de      | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas bierfert lowlatency de | http://lowlatency.de     | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373         | cell: +49 172 9789968    | mail preferred
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCvI2GQEQyPsWM8csRAi/zAJ0X6DoiP8Zmyt4gnscuelxwCBfHYQCghith
TeE/qMAuEcRmh+eT/CMVahY=
=VNNM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]