[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: New Package: fish



On 6/30/05, Michael Schwendt <bugs michael gmx net> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:12:20 +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote:
> 
> > > > http://roo.no-ip.org/fish/fedora/fish-1.11.1-8.src.rpm
> > >
> > > Repeating my earlier hint (%configure macro sets CFLAGS already, Makefile.in
> > > adds the other flags, make target "all" is default):
> >
> > Hmm, you are right, that is done automatically. But your patch changes
> > the CFLAGS part of the spec file back to the state it was in when I
> > originally submitted the package. I was told to change the CFLAGS
> > handling, and now I'm told to change it back to the way it was done in
> > the first place. Is this a disagreement on how the spec file should
> > look or an amusing method of confusing new packagers? :-o
> 
> No, in your original packages you did _not_ use %configure.

Of course. The third option: I am confused. Given how common an
occurance it is, I really should learn to anticipate it.

http://roo.no-ip.org/fish/fedora/fish-1.11.1-9.src.rpm




> 
> --
> Michael Schwendt <mschwendt users sf net>
> Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux 2.6.12-1.1385_FC4
> loadavg: 1.13 1.24 1.61
> 
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
> 

--
Axel


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]