Explicit requires vs. auto library requires, and fc3/devel versioning
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Sun Mar 20 19:13:52 UTC 2005
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> Second, I'm a bit confused by Michael's comment:
> ----------
> But the fortune-mod packages released into Fedora Extras Development have
> the same version-release as those for Fedora Extras 3. That's a bug.
> ----------
> Which brings me to my question: how should releases differ between FC3 and
> development? Are we supposed to have that FC3/FC4 tag as part of the
> release? If so, is this *only* for the case where the FC3 version = FC4
> version?
IMO, disttags are the easiest way to accomplish this. (and further, IMO,
extras should *always* use dist tags, but I doubt that will happen)
*ducks*
--Rex
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list