clearlooks (was: Re: Review needed)

Nils Philippsen nphilipp at redhat.com
Thu Mar 17 08:59:56 UTC 2005


On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 15:42 -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 15:24 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 15:23 -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:
> >  
> > > Couldn't this be added to the gnome-themes-extras package?  Seems like
> > > that could make more sense then having a package for just one theme.
> > > Just a thought.
> > > 
> > 
> > gnome-themes-extras is actually an upstream package.
> > it's not just a conglomeration of things someone wanted to pkg.
> 
> I was aware of that, but are there many other themes that are packaged
> separately?  If so, then disregard my suggestion, otherwise it might be
> worth having a central package for extra themes.

You don't want to push an update for all of the themes when only some
have been updated. So I'd vote for the usual one package upstream, one
package here.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list