[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Approval needed: fftw3

On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:25 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
> This is more or less identical to the fftw that is already in Extras, 
> but is a package of the new version 3 that is incompatible with old 
> fftw. A couple of minor issues were raised when I checked it into CVS, 
> and they have been corrected.

Hi Quentin,

On an FC4t2 system, I checked out the latest fftw3 and all the following
seemed to be in order:

 * specfile is very neat and easy on the eyes [;-)]
 * no errors from rpmlint
 * built, installed, and un-installed cleanly
 * played with the fftwf-wisdom binary (but was not patient 
     enough for for any exhaustive runs)
 * checked file permissions & ownership

I can't find anything the matter with it so please add my name to a
"reviewed and approved-by" message.


Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3 mit edu                ed eh3 com
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]