New package: rblcheck
Paul Howarth
paul at city-fan.org
Fri May 20 14:02:30 UTC 2005
Oliver Falk wrote:
>>> Should be added:
>>> -s xbl.spamhaus.org
>
>
> OK. Added.
Unfortunately the comment in the changelog says you added
xml.spamhaus.org rather than xbl.spamhaus.org (actual rblcheckrc is OK).
Running the standard test lookup of 127.0.0.2, I got:
$ rbl 127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by sbl.spamhaus.org:
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL233
127.0.0.2 listed by xbl.spamhaus.org:
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by dnsbl.njabl.org: open relay -- 1008601823
127.0.0.2 listed by unconfirmed.dsbl.org: http://dsbl.org/listing?127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by multihop.dsbl.org: http://dsbl.org/listing?127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by list.dsbl.org: http://dsbl.org/listing?127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by opm.blitzed.org: Open proxy - see
http://opm.blitzed.org/127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by relays.ordb.org: Listed by ORDB - for testing
purposes only
127.0.0.2 listed by dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net: Dynamic IP Addresses See:
http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net: Spam Received See:
http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by cbl.abuseat.org: Blocked - see
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=127.0.0.2
- OK
127.0.0.2 not listed by relay.ordb.org
- relay.ordb.org is a typo for relays.ordb.org (already included)
127.0.0.2 not listed by blackhole.compu.net
- blackhole.compu.net is a non-existent domain
127.0.0.2 not listed by blackholes.brainerd.net
- no standard test entry but http://blackholes.brainerd.net/ appears to
be alive
127.0.0.2 listed by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
127.0.0.2 listed by blackholes.intersil.net: .spam test entry - direct
spam source
- OK
127.0.0.2 not listed by blackholes.wirehub.net
- blackholes.wirehub.net is a non-existent domain
127.0.0.2 listed by block.blars.org
- OK
127.0.0.2 not listed by bl.reynolds.net.au
- please see http://bl.reynolds.net.au/
- you probably want to replace this with lists from
http://dnsbl.net.au/types/
127.0.0.2 listed by bl.spamcop.net: Blocked - see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?127.0.0.2
- OK
127.0.0.2 not listed by dynablock.wirehub.net
- dynablock.wirehub.net is a non-existent domain
127.0.0.2 listed by flowgoaway.com: Keep away from sunlight, pets and
small children.
- OK
127.0.0.2 not listed by http.opm.blitzed.org
- http.opm.blitzed.org is a non-existent domain
127.0.0.2 listed by korea.services.net: Blocked due to spam, see
http://korea.services.net/blocked.phtml?addr=127.0.0.2
- OK
127.0.0.2 not listed by pm0-no-more.compu.net
- pm0-no-more.compu.net is a non-existent domain
127.0.0.2 not listed by relays.visi.com
- relays.visi.com is a non-existent domain
127.0.0.2 not listed by socks.opm.blitzed.org
- socks.opm.blitzed.org is a non-existent domain
127.0.0.2 listed by spamguard.leadmon.net: Dial-Up/Cable/DSL IP Range -
Use your providers SMTP Gateway
127.0.0.2 listed by spamsources.fabel.dk: Blocked. Contact
spam at netcetera.dk Include this in the subject: 127.0.0.2
127.0.0.2 listed by work.drbl.croco.net
127.0.0.2 listed by relays.linux-kernel.at: Listed_at:dsbl,lkernAT,abuseat
- OK
>>>And for the folks who had a look at the package
>>>allready/will have a look at
>>>the package to approve it. Please note, that I just updated it at:
>
> http://filelister.linux-kernel.at/mod_perl?current=/packages/FC_EXTRAS_APPROVAL/rblcheck
>
> And once again updated. Release 6.
You might want to add a DistTag to the release id - see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag
BuildRoot: isn't the standard one advocated in the packaging guidelines
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines):
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Package builds OK as non-root user.
rpmlint errors:
rpmlint -iv rblcheck-1.5-6*
I: rblcheck checking
E: rblcheck description-line-too-long operated by the MAPS
(http://www.mail-abuse.org/) and ORBL (http://www.orbl.org/)
Your description lines must no exceed 80 characters. If a line is
exceeding this number,
cut it to fit in two lines.
E: rblcheck non-standard-dir-perm
/usr/share/doc/rblcheck-1.5/html/rblcheck 02755
A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message,
that means that you have a wrong directory permission in your package.
E: rblcheck non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/rblcheck-1.5/html 02755
A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message,
that means that you have a wrong directory permission in your package.
E: rblcheck non-standard-dir-perm
/usr/share/doc/rblcheck-1.5/html/rblcheck/stylesheet-images 02755
A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message,
that means that you have a wrong directory permission in your package.
The directory permission errors are probably due to my user account
being in a SGID directory, and the installer copying the directory
permissions. You can fix this by adding:
%{_bindir}/find . -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \;
after:
%setup -q
Paul.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list