Buildsys issues
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Sun Nov 6 13:47:32 UTC 2005
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Some build system issues:
>
> noarch jobs seem to be built in the ppc builder, which is probably the
> slowest of them all and a strong bottleneck candidate. Shouldn't they
> be built on hammer[123] instead?
>
> The ppc/devel build host can't resolve "perl(XML::DOM) >= 1.29". A
> package providing "perl(XML::DOM) = 1.44" was built yesterday and
> released today. It couldn't be resolved today before pushing the
> package, nor about 1 hour after pushing it to the public repo.
>
> Repository generation takes much too long. It was a bit under 30
> minutes for FC-4 and devel each, and 15ish for FC-3. repoview seems to
> be the culprit, taking 25+ minutes of the 30 mentioned above. So,
> totally, one full push takes roughly 1.5 hours, during which human input
> is needed at start, between each of FC-3, FC-4, devel generation, and at
> the end. Very tedious.
So if we take repoview out of the process it only takes 5 minutes for
the process? If so then maybe we should have repoview run on
fedoraproject.org at regular intervals to limit the need for a person to
be in front of it.
Another option is I could look through the repoview code and see why it
is taking so long.
-sv
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list