[Bug 172677] Review Request: perl-Readonly

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677





------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com  2005-11-10 13:47 EST -------
I'm going to contact my service provider and ask why access isn't working for
some people.

-=-

With respect to splitting it - I can do that, but then perl-Readonly-XS will
need to Require perl-Require because it is useless without perl-Readonly.

However - perl-Readonly should also require perl-Readonly-XS because it gives
perl-Readonly-XS a performance boost, and perl scripts that use perl-Readonly
will not require perl-Readonly-XS by automatic dep resolution, so the only way
to get perl-Readonly-XS pulled in with yum is to have perl-Readonly require it.

Since the two modules will thus need to require each other, and are maintained
by the same maintainer, and released in pair (new version of one means new
version of other) - does it really make sense for them to be separate packages
in this case?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.