[Bug 173790] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fcextras

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 21 12:21:39 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fcextras


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173790





------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com  2005-11-21 07:21 EST -------
The reason for

gstreamer-plugins-audio
and
gstreamer-plugins-video

is because several of the various package repositories decided upon this naming
scheme early on, and it would be silly to break it imho if we don't have to,
especially when it is being used for the rpm.livna.org non free packages.

The naming scheme for addon packages was

Free (not patent encumbered)
gstreamer-plugins-audio
gstreamer-plugins-video
Non Free (as in patent encumbered)
gstreamer-extra-audio
gstreamer-extra-video
gstreamer-extra-dvd

This is the scheme used at

http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/pkg/fedora/4/i386/RPMS.gst/

-=-
With respect to the src.rpm - livna already has a
gstreamer-plugins-extra

src.rpm - gstreamer-plugins-extras is too close to that, hence the fcextras
It's only in the src.rpm - not the binary rpm's.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list