[Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Nov 26 13:07:59 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174240
gajownik at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gajownik at gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2005-11-26 08:07 EST -------
Hi!
Do you need to generate fonts from *.bdf files? Maybe it would be better to use
artwiz-aleczapka-{de,en,se}-1.3.tar.bz2 tarballs?
Shouldn't `fc-cache' be run in %post{,un} section like in dejavu-fonts?
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec?root=extras
What do you think about changing package name to artwiz-aleczapka-fonts to keep
the name consistent with other fonts RPMs from Extras?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165900#c6
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list