[Bug 166459] Review Request: bigloo - compiler for the Scheme programming language

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bigloo - compiler for the Scheme programming language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166459





------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2005-10-14 18:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> bigloo-libs-2.6f-3 is not in CVS and not in the repository either.
My mistake. I installed anew from extras.
But still the i386 bigloo-2.6f-1.fc4 doesn't have this problem.
I would like to know what it is that is different in the ppc build.
Building and linking should be identical, shouldn't it?

> bigloo-libs-2.6f-1.fc4 is.  devel ppc is affected, too.  In the ppc
> build log it might be possible to see what it does with your
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH which is modified to include a build directory.
> 
> $ grep builddir *
> Binary file libbigloobdl_s-2.6f.so matches
> Binary file libbigloobdl_u-2.6f.so matches
> Binary file libbigloofth_s-2.6f.so matches
> Binary file libbigloofth_u-2.6f.so matches
> 
> $ readelf -d libbigloobdl_s-2.6f.so | grep build
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library:
> [/builddir/build/BUILD/bigloo2.6f/lib/2.6f/libbigloo_s-2.6f.so]

There are always some problems with archs other than i386, mostly ppc,
sometimes x86_64. I have no means to test on these, maybe there should
be some experts in the fedora project, that can help these problem, or at
least a testing build system, where one can try out some things.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.