libGL* dependencies (was: Re: rpms/xforms/devel xforms.spec,1.9,1.10)

[Ville Skyttä]

On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 07:33 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2005, 06:43 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> > 
> > For the moment, I'll stay with real package dependencies, such as
> > "BR: xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL" for my GL based packages in FE.
> 
> And IMHO that is the right decision.

But it won't be any different from the libGL approach regarding the
x86_64 case where both x86_64 and i386 repositories are enabled,
right?  

(Leaving the nvidia + friends libGL things aside for the moment,
assuming FC stuff only enabled; and yes, I understand why pulling them
in as a build dep instead of the Mesa libGL would not be desirable.)