A lot of obsolete rpms in FE currently

[Greg DeKoenigsberg]

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

> Because of the "rolling" nature of the Extras tree.. i feel its
> vital..that at least one older version of packages are in the tree for
> a period of time after an update is pushed in case an updated package
> has a showstopping problem.. so users can fallback to something while
> any such problem is worked out and fixed.

s/at least one/exactly one?

Would this constitute a sensible policy?

--g 

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan