[Bug 171505] Review Request: digikamimageplugins: Plugins for digikam

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 13:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:30:59 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > > ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu  2005-10-22 11:26 EST -------
> > > Gotta love libtool.
> > You are just spreading FUD.
> > 
> > >   Looks like a digikam bug (not omitting libtool archives),
> > > bug #171503
> > How many time do I have to reiterate: You must not remove *.la's if it
> > once had been inside of a released package or rebuild each and every
> > package depending on it.
> > 
> > If *.la's were always being shipped this all would not be an issue. 
> 
> Libtool inter-library dependencies are not beneficial.

Weather like it or not: They exist and you doing nobody a favor in
ignoring them - You are just shifting them around.

Ralf