[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: New Maintainer Request: tla



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Zoltan Kota wrote:
| On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Shahms King wrote:
|
|
|>Due to a variety of reasons I'm going to have to stop maintaining the
|>tla (GNU Arch) packages. There are a few tla-related bugs still in
|>bugzilla, almost all of them relate to the fact that tla fails 'make
|>check' on PPC.  This build failure has held back a number of updates and
|>is the reason the FE tla packages are still at 1.3.1fix1 rather than the
|>current upstream 1.3.3 version.  The 1.3.3 packages are in CVS, but,
|>like I said fail to build.  I was hoping upstream would resolve the
|>issue, but Tom Lord (the 'tl' in tla) has stopped working on tla and put
|>his efforts into a redesigned "Arch 2.0".  Most work on tla is focused
|
|
| And are you planning to import/maintain "arch 2.0" when it's out?
|
| Zoltan

I'm not sure. Tom Lord's personality leads me to think that Arch 2.0
will be about as long lived as the current incarnation and probably
suffer from similar maintainence problems. I would like to see "revc"
(as Arch 2.0 is called) in Extras, but I'm not sure that I'll have the
time to maintain the packages and have personally switched to using
bazaar anyway.

At the moment, I have no plans on importing revc, but that could change.


- --
Shahms E. King <shahms shahms com>
Multnomah ESD

Public Key:
http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/~sking/shahms.asc
Fingerprint:
1612 054B CE92 8770 F1EA  AB1B FEAB 3636 45B2 D75B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDKJ10/qs2NkWy11sRAsBHAKDAOlhX7cIbpOeP34TqQs01CVWKyACfYMjL
0c1VztLzzvU5wRaeHyiMsAA=
=21zp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]