[Bug 165488] Review Request: Weather status dockapp

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 15 14:47:25 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Weather status dockapp


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165488





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2005-09-15 10:47 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> >> There is no need to list the man page in %files as this is done  
> >> automatically.  
>   
> > That is not true, at least not in any version of rpm I've ever used.  
>   
> This link disagrees with you. ;-)  
>
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-DOCDIR-DIRECTIVE


No, that agrees with me. About two thirds of the way down that page, it says:

  %docdir only directs RPM to mark the specified directory as holding
  documentation. It doesn't direct RPM to package any files in the
  directory

> By default the doc, info and man directories are searched for documents.

It means that any files you specify in the %files list that are in directories
marked as %docdir are treated as documentation, which will be excluded if the
package is installed using --excludedocs. This includes manpages, info etc. by
default. However, you still need to include the manpages etc. in the %files list.

If you try commenting out the manpages from the %files list, you'll find that
rpmbuild complains about unpackaged files.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list