[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Bug 168339] Review Request: libbinio



On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 06:33 -0400, bugzilla redhat com wrote:

> ------- Additional Comments From triad df lth se  2005-09-16 06:33 EST -------
> OK so how are these disputes normally resolved?
> 
> I have no problem with doing what Ralf says, because the package that
> I am creating to use libbinio do not complain about having its headers
> in /include/binio so that is OK with me.

> Ralf says he will veto against this package unless I do so, so Ville,
Not quite, I said, I will not approve _any_ package which installs its
headers to /usr/include and that I am _considering_ to veto against this
package.

> will you also veto against it in case I do so that it is a catch22
> situation, or can you live with that I follow Ralfs demand?
... feel free to do whatever you want to do ... ATM, I regret having
ever answered ...

Ralf



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]