RFC: FESCo Future

Michael A. Peters mpeters at mac.com
Tue Apr 25 02:28:44 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 00:46 +0200, Christian.Iseli at licr.org wrote:

> 
> I also do not see any rule that says *all* FESCo members must be elected.  
> Maybe a few could be delegates from the Fedora Project Board, to ensure some 
> consistency.

I like that idea.
I think there should be more elected than appointed, but four appointed
and nine elected is a good balance. There is some guidance in the
appointed members as necessary, but they are outnumbered by the
community elected by enough that they can't bulldoze how things are run.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list