package EOL

[Michael J. Knox]

Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 4/25/06, Michael J. Knox <michael at knox.net.nz> wrote:
>> legacy = unmaintainable and with out a maintainer
> 
> that is a poor definition given the fact that that definition of the
> word does not fit at all with what the fedora legacy project does.
> Pick a different word that does not cause confusion between what the
> current fedora legacy project does and what you are trying to
> describe.
> 

Sure, this thread is about ideas and suggestion.

So, do you have any suggestion for it?


Perhaps "retired packages" is a better fit?

Michael