SPF failures nuke fedora-extras* msgs from redhat.com

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Mon Aug 21 21:32:49 UTC 2006


On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 07:54:09PM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > So, either this should go to the sysadmins responsoble for redhat,
> 
> It's definitely their problem.
> 
> > or it should go as a bug report to perl-Mail-SPF-Query.
> 
> Please don't do that.  :-)

I agree, whether a mail domain hosting some resources of Fedora has
some policy on SPF and whether SPF is available to other users thorugh
Fedora is a different story. We don't want to endorse either side
through the repo's contents.

Paul, could you contact postmaster@ which is the `person' the RFCs
scapegoat for such a case?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060821/c36065b9/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list