[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: SPF failures nuke fedora-extras* msgs from redhat.com



On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:38:53PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:30:48PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Personally, I think we should drop perl-Mail-SPF-Query, or at _least_
> > modify our SpamAssassin package so that it needs to be _explicitly_
> > asked to do SPF rather than doing so by default if the package is
> > installed.
> 
> I disagree with you on SPF in many regards, but this part I totally agree
> with. Having a package behave totally differently depending simply on the
> *presence* of a perl module is bad behavior.

That's true of a lot of other (optional) perl modules in spamassassin.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpayvD9R4QAJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]