[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-08-25



On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:24:13 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:

> > On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:57:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >
> > > MS> What I meant is that building a broken package doesn't change the
> > > MS> situation much. Now pyxdg is available again, but still broken and
> > > MS> hence still breaking fluxbox. ;o)
> > >
> > > I don't really understand what is broken.
> >
> > Bugzilla has the info for almost a year now. Just query the pyxdg bug
> > reports. That is the least thing you ought to do before touching somebody's
> > package.
> 
> Erm, why would anyone care about an FC3 bug?  I thought all FC3 bugs
> were closed anyway?

What is so difficult to understand? At the time the bug report was filed,
FC3+FE3 was still alive. Btw, treating bugzilla like a gateway to /dev/null
is simply impolite.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]