[Bug 176137] Review Request: perl-Log-Log4perl - Log4j implementation for Perl
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Feb 9 12:43:49 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Log4perl - Log4j implementation for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176137
paul at city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |paul at city-fan.org
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-02-09 07:43 EST -------
Review:
- rpmlint clean
- package and spec naming OK
- package meets guidelines
- license is same as perl, matches spec, text included
- spec file written in English and is legible
- sources match upstream
- package builds OK on FC4 (i386) and in mock for rawhide (i386)
- BR's OK
- no locales, libraries, pkgconfigs, or subpackages to worry about
- not relocatable
- no directory ownership or permissions issues
- no duplicate files
- %clean section present and correct
- macro usage is consistent
- code, not content
- no large docs
- docs don't affect runtime
- no desktop file needed
- no scriptlets
- patches look sane
Suggestions:
- perhaps a comment in the spec file about the issue with
Log::Dispatch::FileRotate, and a reference to this bugzilla ticket?
- perhaps the rrdtool buildreq could be replaced by perl(RRDs)?
Approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list