[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rpms/ginac/devel ginac.spec,1.2,1.3



Ralf Corsepius wrote:

On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 11:33 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
Author: qspencer

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ginac/devel
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30627

Modified Files:
ginac.spec Log Message:
Update URL and fix unpackaged files.


Index: ginac.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ginac/devel/ginac.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- ginac.spec	31 Oct 2005 23:23:57 -0000	1.2
+++ ginac.spec	2 Feb 2006 16:33:55 -0000	1.3
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Group:          System Environment/Libraries
License:        GPL
URL:            http://www.ginac.de/
-Source0:        ftp://ftpthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/pub/GiNaC/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Source0:        http://www.ginac.de/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
@@ -86,24 +86,29 @@

%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root)
+%doc %{_infodir}/*.info*
+%doc %{_mandir}/man?/ginac-config.1*
These %doc are redundant, please remove them.


Redundant how?

%{_libdir}/*.a
Why are you shipping static libs?

I don't know. I modeled my first spec files that included libraries after others that were already in Extras, and have just done things that way all along (including a few other packages I maintain), but this was all before people started preaching the evils of static libs. I guess I can remove them.

-Quentin


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]