[Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 5 19:22:38 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com              |jpmahowald at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2006-02-05 14:22 EST -------
Can't sponsor, but I am interested in circuit software.


** Configuration summary for libgdgeda 2.0.15:

   Support for PNG library:          yes
   Support for JPEG library:         no
   Support for Freetype 2.x library: no
   Support for Xpm library:          no

Why not add these? It's usually a good idea to enable as many features as
possible. All it would take is adding libjpeg-devel and freetype-devel to
BuildRequires.


# install will be a bit complicated because we are not assured
# that the builder has root privileges

What do you mean by this? All packages are built by a non root user, and I did
sucessfully. You have defined a BuildRoot you don't need root to write to.

The source in the tarball isn't matching what I downloaded for some reason.
d4978ce4e8eb9fa2e7c0d7dba40b3c5b  libgdgeda-2.0.15.tar.gz (downloaded)
1580beb2bd224f38ce8637c67a5512f8  /tmp/libgdgeda-2.0.15.tar.gz (src rpm)


rpmlint checks are clean, which is good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list