Packaging review guidelines clarification
Ed Hill
ed at eh3.com
Thu Feb 16 05:02:21 UTC 2006
Hi folks,
I'm reviewing a package that builds on FC4 but not on devel due to
recent GCC issues. According to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
"MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into
binary rpms on at least one supported architecture."
but, unfortunately, this says nothing about *which* version(s) of FC
should be used. I think "one supported architecture on either
FC-current or FC-devel" would be appropriate but thats just my opinion.
And I could appreciate the reasoning behind "must build on FC-devel"
since its where all FE packages are initially imported. So would
someone (Spot?) please clarify?
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office: MIT Dept. of EAPS; Rm 54-1424; 77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails: eh3 at mit.edu ed at eh3.com
URLs: http://web.mit.edu/eh3/ http://eh3.com/
phone: 617-253-0098
fax: 617-253-4464
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list