Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Sat Feb 18 15:19:41 UTC 2006
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 18.02.2006, 14:26 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, den 18.02.2006, 13:43 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
>>
>> As I already wrote in the part of my mail you didn't quote I delayed my
>> rebuilds because of the extra rebuild, once this was done I started it.
>> Appereantly the discussion is when the extra rebuild was complete, in my
>> view this was done when the last rawhide changelog mail was send. +
>> maybe some time for the buildsys to pick up the changes I don't know
>> how/when the buildsys syncs to rawhide.
>
> That's okay. And I wrote earlier in this thread:
>
>> Okay. We can revisit that point in time and can set i back some hours --
>> but where exactly? And wherever we put it, there will probably always be
>> someone who'll say "My package was rebuild just <insert something
>> between 1 and 1440> minutes earlier then <new point of time>, why does
>> it need a rebuild?" This could soon lead to and endless discussion that
>> might take a lot of more time then it takes to just rebuild the packages
>> in question...
>>
>> But Hans, Zoltan, if you come up with a new point of time that is
>> acceptable for everyone I'm willing to change the script to that one.
>
> Hans, so simply *give me a time* and this discussion can end. Just make
> sure that the packages after that time were probably be build after the
> buildsys picked up the latest rawhide changes.
>
Thats the problem, I don't know how long it takes for the buildsys to
pick up rawhide changes, so I'm suggesting to use the time of the
rawhide changelog mail + some extra time , hoping that someone who knows
the buildsys can tell us what amount of extra time is needed after the
rawhide changelog mail.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list