[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras)

Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2006, 21:22 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:22:26 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Okay, let's look at the whole situation from a different perspective.
> > The following list shows maintainers that still have to rebuild more
> > than 5 packages:
> > 5 nos_AT_utelsystems.com
> Nils has not signed up since the transition from fedora.us to Fedora
> Extras.

Okay, so they are practically orphaned for at least a year? Wow.

So let's orphan them for real. Anyone interested in on of the following

dillo, gktools, gtkterm, neverball, whowatch

> > bugs.michael_AT_gmx.net                     abicheck                            1.2-9
> This is a noarch package in disguise, a Perl script. Its build-time tests
> have given mixed results on different archs several times before. Hence I
> prefer building it platform-dependent.
> > bugs.michael_AT_gmx.net                     aide                                0.10-2
> Due to upstream changes in libmhash I've delayed updates here as long as
> possible. Trouble with flex on x86_64 (bug #183098) still needs further
> investigation.

Added this informations to where we track it now:


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]