[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Rebuild status of FE5 (Was: Re: Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras)

Hash: SHA1

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Montag, den 27.02.2006, 16:09 -0800 schrieb Michael Thomas:
>>Wart wrote:
>>>Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2006, 21:22 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
>>>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:22:26 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>>>Okay, let's look at the whole situation from a different perspective.
>>>>>>The following list shows maintainers that still have to rebuild more
>>>>>>than 5 packages:
>>>>>>5 nos_AT_utelsystems.com
>>>>>Nils has not signed up since the transition from fedora.us to Fedora
>>>>Okay, so they are practically orphaned for at least a year? Wow.
>>>>So let's orphan them for real. Anyone interested in on of the following
>>>>dillo, gktools, gtkterm, neverball, whowatch
>>>I can pick up neverball if there are no objections.
>>No objections?  None?  Whee!  :)
>>I emailed Nils to see if he was still interested in maintaining these,
>>but I haven't gotten a reply yet.
>>So is this the right time to add these to OrphanedPackages on the wiki
> Yes, go ahead.

I finally got confirmation from Nils that he is no longer maintaining
these packages.  I've added them to the wiki.

>>so that others can make claim to them, and claim neverball myself by
>>updating owners.list?
> Well, according to the docs in the wiki we normally wait 10 days. But
> we're running out of time for FE5. Wait another days or two and if no
> one steps up go ahead. That okay for everybody?

Fair enough.

- --Wart
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]